Growth of Petrus rupestris
Auximetric graph Lm vs Linf graph M vs Linf graph
Lm vs Linf graph M vs K graph
(loading of graphs may take 2-3 min.)

Main Ref. : 3212     Data Ref. : 
Data Type : annuli on many otoliths 
Sex : unsexed 
L infinity (cm) : 138.0 FL 95% confidence limit:      
K (1/y) : 0.075   other method(s)/n.a. n: r2: 95% confidence limit:      
to (y) : -0.25 95% confidence limit:  
Winf. : 56.4 kg using LWR of species   b used :2.952 Ø' : 3.15
C :  
M (1/y) : 0.150  M Ref. :4332   M doubtful? n: r2: 95% confidence limit:      
from tmax & Hoenig's model
Lm (cm) : 57.5 0.42 Unsexed FL Lm Ref. :  
Locality : Coffee Bay to Struis Bay
Country : South Africa
Environment: open waters 
Temp. : 22.0       Temp. Ref. : 37814
Comment : Do not use M value for new model to predict M. Growth estimates outlier in auximetric graph? Not checked.
Glossary
Comments & Corrections

cfm script by celloran, 20/08/01 ,  php script by mortiz, 27/05/10 ,  last modified by sortiz, 09/08/17