Diagnosis |
This species is distinguished from Paracanthopoma parva by the following characters: a short and anteriorly-displaced opercular patch of odontodes, leaving a large posterior free area of integument continuous with the rest of the head integument around it (in dorsal view the posterior tips of the opercular odontodes do not reach the base of the pectoral fin); pelvic fin 3 (vs. 5); opercle without an ascending process (vs. with ascending process); caudal peduncle spatulate by hypertrophied series of 22?29 (upper) and 20?29 (lower) procurrent caudal-fin rays (vs. caudal peduncle narrow, with 15-19 upper and 14-18 lower rays); median premaxillary dentition feeble, with 3 delicate teeth (vs. median premaxillary dentition robust, 9 large strong teeth); supraorbital canals opening as two separate s6 pores (vs. canals fused at midline and opening as single median s6 pore); caudal fin slightly convex or truncate, with round edges (the apparent emarginated margin is a preservation artifact) (vs. bilobed or emarginate, concave); supraoccipital no anterior median process (vs. supraoccipital with produced anterior process); origins of dorsal and anal fins approximately at same vertical (vs. origin of dorsal fin clearly anterior to vertical through origin of anal fin) (Ref. 124573). |